🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an celebration that started out as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include events where African descendants are remunerated to talk to Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the observance is celebrated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the current time in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a member of parliament gains confidence to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the EU as a whole.

In the America, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the state. A effort to scrub Black history and legacy from the records is ongoing. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the month symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the conditions of the present. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, believing they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an period that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an foundation that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for citizens, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Establishments who observe it should not be pacified with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to minor insults, but confronted with the threats that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and responsive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Black History is Now Month.